Why does LaTeX split footnotes across pages?

LaTeX splits footnotes when it can think of nothing better to do. Typically, when this happens, the footnote mark is at the bottom of the page, and the complete footnote would overfill the page. LaTeX could try to salvage this problem by making the page short of both the footnote and the line with the footnote mark, but its priorities told it that splitting the footnote would be preferable.

As always, the best solution is to change your text so that the problem doesn’t occur in the first place. Consider whether the text that bears the footnote could move earlier in the current page, or on to the next page.

If this isn’t possible, you might want to change LaTeX’s perception of its priorities: they’re controlled by `\``interfootnotelinepenalty` — the larger it is, the less willing LaTeX is to split footnotes.

Setting

```\interfootnotelinepenalty=10000
```

inhibits split footnotes altogether, which will cause ‘`Underfull` `\``vbox`’ messages unless you also specify `\``raggedbottom`. The default value of the penalty is `100`, which is rather mild.

An alternative technique is to juggle with the actual size of the pages. `\``enlargethispage` changes the size of the current page by its argument (for example, you might say `\``enlargethispage{\baselineskip}` to add a single line to the page, but you can use any ordinary TeX length such as `15mm` or `-20pt` as argument). Reducing the size of the current page could force the offending text to the next page; increasing the size of the page may allow the footnote to be included in its entirety. It may be necessary to change the size of more than one page.

The fnbreak package detects (and generates warnings about) split footnotes.

fnbreak.sty
macros/latex/contrib/fnbreak (or browse the directory); catalogue entry

This question on the Web: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=splitfoot